Molick v. D.G.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(a) A review of the findings and order may be ordered at any time by a district court judge and must be ordered if a party files a written request for a review within three days after receiving the notice in Section 10(b). The request for review must state the reasons for the review. (b) The review by a district court judge must be a review of the record, unless the court orders a hearing of the proceeding.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re AB · L.S.W. v. K.B.

2. “there was no direct possession linked to this child ... and also because of the fact a third party may have had access to the place where the [controlled substance] was located in the child's parental home....”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re LAG

3. “[c]onstructive possession may be established by showing the defendant had the power and ability to exercise dominion and control over the controlled substance.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Woinarowicz