State v. Richmond’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Minnesota v. Dickerson · Minnesota v. Olson · State v. Joon Kyu Kim
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unless it reasonably appears to the officer that arrest or detention is necessary to prevent bodily harm to the accused or another or further criminal conduct, or that there is a substantial likelihood that the accused will fail to respond to a citation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Askerooth“[t]aking into account the discretion due district courts on credibility assessment of oral testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.