Commonwealth v. Omar’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
32 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1052 (§ 2 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. Fox · United States v. Albertini · Commonwealth v. Davidson · Malt Beverages Distributors Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As the constitutionality of a statute is a pure question of law, our standard of review is de novo and our scope of review is plenary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.