Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 602 SO2D 1288 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
12
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

1 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2015

1 district · 22 state decisions — followed in 12 states

170199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab · State v. Webb · 345 So. 2d 417 - Travelers Indem. Co. of RI v. Mirlenbrink · 576 So. 2d 1310 - Perkins v. State · Torres v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “susceptible of differing constructions, it shall be construed most favorably to the accused.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[Various] considerations have led the American Medical Association Board of Trustees to oppose criminal sanctions for harmful behavior by a pregnant woman toward her fetus and to advocate that pregnant [offenders] be provided with rehabilitative treatment appropriate to their specific psychological and physiological needs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “that the legislative history does not show a manifest intent to use the word `delivery' in the context of criminally prosecuting mothers for delivery of a controlled substance to a minor by way of the umbilical cord”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.