Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 602 SO2D 568 - Orange County v. Lust

Orange County v. Lust’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 95 So. 2d 912 - De Groot v. Sheffield · 419 So. 2d 624 - City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant · Stringfellow v. Stringfellow · 564 So. 2d 480 - Cresswell v. State · State v. Jimeno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a district court of appeal may not quash a circuit court's decision because it disagrees with the circuit court's evaluation of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.