602 So. 2d 906 - Peeks v. Peeks’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 1996
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tcherneshoff v. Tcherneshoff · 475 So. 2d 571 - Dockins v. Dockins · McGraw v. McGraw · 537 So. 2d 967 - Washington v. State Ex Rel. King
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““At the outset we note that a final judgment is one in which there has been a complete adjudication of all matters in controversy between the parties. The question of whether a decree is final and will support an appeal is jurisdictional, and once this court determines that the decree appealed from is not final, it has a duty to dismiss the appeal on its own motion. Where there is no appealable judgment or decree in the record, we have no alternative to dismissing the appeal.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.