Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

602 So. 2d 974

Shoop v. Shoop

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-07-08

Decided 1992-07-08

PER CURIAM.

¶1AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, J. and ALDERMAN, JAMES E., Senior Justice, concur.ANSTEAD, J., dissenting in part with opinion.
ANSTEAD, Judge,

¶2dissenting in part.

¶3I dissent only as to the issue of rehabilitative alimony. There is no evidentiary or legal basis for the court’s order that the former husband pay an additional three *975years of rehabilitative alimony, in addition to permanent periodic alimony.

/602/so2d/974 · .json · Public domain