¶1Affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); Zalis v. Zalis, 498 So.2d 505 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Schein v. Schein, 448 So.2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Koeppel v. Koeppel, 351 So.2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
602 So. 2d 985
Rubelman v. Rubelman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 21, 1992
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-07-21
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 334 So. 2d 13 - Shaw v. Shaw · 351 So. 2d 766 - Koeppel v. Koeppel
Decided 1992-07-21