Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

602 So. 2d 999

Cooper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 18, 1992

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-08-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1993

1 state decisions

Relies on Kearney v. State · 575 So. 2d 1335 - Ford v. State · 596 So. 2d 744 - Pyle v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-08-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Sharon Cooper has appealed from a sentence imposed following her plea of nolo contendere to grand theft, and cashing or depositing an item with intent to defraud. The State of Florida has moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, citing section 924.-06, Florida Statutes (1989), Ford v. State, 575 So.2d 1335 (Fla. 1st DCA1991), and Kearney v. State, 579 So.2d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA1991).

¶2We deny the motion to dismiss, Pyle v. State, 596 So.2d 744 (Fla. 1st DCA1992), and affirm. However, we direct that the special condition of probation requiring Cooper to pay $1.00 monthly to First Step of Bay Co., Inc. be stricken, based on the trial court’s failure to pronounce that condition orally at sentencing. See Brown v. State, 600 So.2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA1992) and Elmore v. State, 600 So.2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA1992).

JOANOS, C.J., and ALLEN and WOLF, JJ., concur.
/602/so2d/999 · .json · Public domain