Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney’s Empirical Analysis
2024
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1116 (§ 34 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 3626 (§ 20409 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 29 U.S.C. § 151 (§ 1 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 178 (§ 208 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital · Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill · University of Texas v. Camenisch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.