Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 603 F.2d 409 - United States v. Markus

United States v. Markus’s Empirical Analysis

603 F.2d 409 · 1979

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 2 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2020 · most notably Wasman v. United States (1984), United States v. Vontsteen (1992)

24 federal appellate · 2 district · 11 state decisions

150197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 472 · 18 U.S.C. § 473 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Tocco v. United States · United States v. Sacco · United States v. Coke · United States v. Welty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]ntervening convictions ... based on indictments pending at the time of the original sentencing ... and upon conduct predating that sentencing, cannot satisfy Pearce's exacting requirement”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.