City of Rochester v. Bond’s Empirical Analysis
603 F.2d 927 · 1979
Citation profile
118 federal appellate · 30 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 224 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2023 · most notably General Public Utilities Corporation v. Susquehanna Valley Alliance (1981), Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications Commission (1984)
118 federal appellate · 30 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Gerry v. United States · Infelice v. United States · City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey · Calvert Cliffs' Coordinating Committee, Inc. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 224 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there exists a special statutory review procedure, it is ordinarily supposed that Congress intended that procedure to be the exclusive means of obtaining judicial review in those cases to which it applies.”
32 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“going to the substantive core of an agency’s mandate.” Id. at 936-37 . 6 . The Privacy Act’s grant of original jurisdiction to the district courts, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(1), does not change this conclusion. The D.C. Circuit has adopted the rule that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Any order, affirmative or negative, issued by the [CAB] or [FAA] under this chapter, except any order in respect of any foreign air carrier subject to the approval of the President as provided in section 1461 of this title, shall be subject to review by the courts of appeals of the United States or the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upon petition, filed within sixty days after the entry of such order, by any person disclosing a substantial interest in such order. After the expiration of said sixty days a petition may be filed only by leave of court upon a showing of reasonable grounds for failure to file the petition theretofore.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. O'DONNELL v. Bond
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.