Bracic v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
603 F.3d 1027 · 2010
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Islami v. Gonzales · Al Khouri v. Ashcroft · Setiadi v. Gonzales · Fisher v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Lopez v. Heinauer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as the question of whether an immigration hearing violates due process is a purely legal issue.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“has not shown how the procedural error would have changed the outcome of his case because he has offered no new evidence [and has] advanced [no] new issues that would have established his entitlement to asylum or withholding of removal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ramirez v. Sessions“may review a final order of removal only if ... the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ramirez v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.