Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

603 F.3d 1100

Docket No. 09-60008.

In Re Gould

In re Anthony S. GOULD, Debtor, Anthony S. Gould, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, and Devin Derham-Burk, Chapter 13; United States Trustee, Trustees.

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 9, 2010.

Filed April 30, 2010.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-04-30

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 553 · 26 U.S.C. § 6402

Relies on United States v. Gould (In Re Gould) · In Re Gould

Decided 2010-04-30

¶1David A. Boone and Leela V. Menon, Law Offices of David A. Boone, San Jose, CA, for the appellant.

¶2Randolph L. Hutter, Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington DC, for the appellee.

¶3Before: DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, STEPHEN S. TROTT and RICHARD A. PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

¶4

ORDER

¶5The published order filed April 19, 2010, is hereby WITHDRAWN.

¶6

ORDER

¶7The central issue in this case is whether or not the Bankruptcy Court erred in denying the government's motion to lift the automatic stay to allow the Internal Revenue Service "IRS" to offset the debtor's income tax overpayment against his outstanding federal income tax liabilities pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 553 and 26 U.S.C. § 6402(a). For the reasons given by our Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in In re Gould,401 B.R. 415 (9th Cir.BAP 2009), we reverse the decision of the Bankruptcy Court, In re Gould,389 B.R. 105 (Bkrtcy. N.D.Cal.2008), and remand for further proceedings. We note that for cases filed after October 17, 2005, 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(26) permits the IRS to setoff a pre-petition income tax overpayment against a pre-petition income tax liability without seeking relief from the automatic stay.

¶8Accordingly, the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel is AFFIRMED.

/603/f3d/1100 · .json · Public domain