Stroman v. Thaler’s Empirical Analysis
603 F.3d 299 · 2010
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Varnado v. Lynaugh · United States of America v. Norma Burgos-Andjar · United States v. Bahena · Phillips v. Donnelly · Lacava v. Kyler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“show[n] that he 'pursued the [habeas corpus relief] process with diligence and alacrity' both before and after receiving notification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jackson v. Davis“quickly [a petitioner] pursued federal habeas relief after receiving delayed notice of the denial of his state habeas application.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jackson v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.