Whitney v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1395C (§ 1811 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395K (§ 1832 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395R (§ 1839 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395T (§ 1841 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395U (§ 1842 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Nebbia v. People of State of New York · Phelps Dodge Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board · United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers · Nixon v. Administrator of General Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is the lowest of these three. 2 5 Prior to the enactment of the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, a Part B enrollee could pay for medical services in one of two ways. The beneficiary could pay the physician directly and then request reimbursement from Medicare. Id. Sec. 1395u(b)(3)(B)(i). Alternatively, if a physician were willing, the beneficiary could assign to the physician the beneficiary's right to reimbursement. Id. Sec. 1395u(b)(3)(B)(ii). The physician, as the beneficiary's assignee, then collected payment directly from Medicare. 6 Under this program, Medicare's”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Whitney v. Heckler“program will depend on the involvement of the Medicare beneficiaries nationwide. In providing an increased amount of information to the beneficiary, the conferees hope they will take this opportunity to become increasingly informed about the practice patterns of the physicians in their communities. H.R.Conf.Rep. No. 98-861, at 1313-14, reprinted in Legislative History at 2001-02. Accord 130 Cong.Rec.S. 8373, 8375 (daily ed. June 27, 1984) (Sen. Dole), reprinted in Legislative History at 2157. 18 Although the Supreme Court has given a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Whitney v. Heckler“charge data were updated each year on July 1 based on the prior year's data. Physicians were also permitted to accept or decline assignment on a claim-by-claim basis, and if a physician chose not to accept assignment, Medicare placed no limitation on the amount that he could charge a Part B enrollee. Patients of physicians not accepting assignment, however, received Medicare reimbursement only for the 80% of Medicare's”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Whitney v. Heckler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.