Licudine v. Winter’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 1394 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on New Jersey v. New York · Gomez v. Dade County School Board · Speth v. New Jersey · Lage v. United States · McMullan v. National Bank of Commerce
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The dismissal of this [employment discrimination] complaint is not based on the merits of the [plaintiffs] claim that he should have been covered under the civil service retirement system. The dismissal of the instant case is based solely on the employee’s status as a non-U.S. citizen and therefore he has no standing to file a claim of discrimination under the provisions of [ 29 C.F.R. § 1614.103 (c)],”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.