State v. Cooley’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2020
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 2 Utah 2d 371 - State v. Ferry · 22 Utah 2d 377 - State v. Peterson · 11 Utah 2d 429 - State v. Sanchez · State v. Whittinghill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“with intent to cause substantial emotional or bodily pain to any person or with the intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Whitaker“The factfinder ... is entitled to draw all reasonable. inferences from the facts and from the actions of the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Whitaker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.