Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 603 So. 2d 1012 - Ladner v. Inge

603 So. 2d 1012 - Ladner v. Inge’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2015

4 state decisions

20199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 547 So. 2d 870 - West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of Florida · 538 So. 2d 794 - Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY. · Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc. · 496 So. 2d 756 - Wilson v. Brown · 543 So. 2d 686 - Berner v. Caldwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “sustained the alleged injury or damage . . . when she accepted the unsecured promissory notes and delivered the *Page 46 warranty deeds,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]n addition to having no security interest and having her claims vulnerable to the priority enjoyed by holders of other claims, [the plaintiff] could not sell or assign the unsecured promissory notes in the same manner as she could have sold or assigned a note secured by a mortgage; nor could she have transferred it for a comparable value.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “unsecured promissory notes . . . are less valuable than promissory notes secured by mortgages,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.