Gloster v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 475 So. 2d 682 - Florida Bar Standard Jury Instructions Civil 85-1 · 498 So. 2d 929 - State v. Wimberly · 533 So. 2d 1169 - State v. Sanborn · 566 So. 2d 881 - Perez v. State · 541 So. 2d 1219 - Shelby v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“3. (Defendant) acted for any other purpose other than to: (a) hold for ransom or reward or as a shield or hostage. (b) commit or facilitate commission of any felony. (c) inflict bodily harm upon or to terrorize the victim or another person. (d) interfere with the performance of any governmental or political function.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Scott v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.