Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 603 SO2D 368 - Haney v. State

Haney v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
4
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 97 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably 710 So. 2d 1276 - Williams v. State (1996), 695 So. 2d 70 - Bush v. State (1996)

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 97 state decisions

520199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gregg v. Georgia · Lockett v. Ohio · Wainwright v. Witt · Sandstrom v. Montana · Eddings v. Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “provided reasonable assurance that prejudice would have been discovered if present.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “The Alabama Supreme Court has adopted federal case law defining plain error, holding that `”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"In all cases in which the death penalty has been imposed, the Court of Criminal Appeals shall notice any plain error or defect in the proceedings under review, whether or not brought to the attention of the trial court, and take appropriate appellate action by reason thereof, whenever such error has or probably has adversely affected the substantial right of the appellant."”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.