PER CURIAM. ¶1 Upon the authority of Scates v. State , 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992), we quash State v. Liataud , 587 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), and remand with directions to reinstate Liataud’s probation.
¶2 It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur. GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion, in which HARDING, J., concurs. McDONALD, J., dissents. GRIMES, Justice, ¶3 dissenting.
¶4 I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Scates v. State , 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992).
HARDING, J., concurs. Download
Copy
Embed on your site
iframe Markdown Preview card Button Hover to preview · click to copy the code
Court Parallel citations 603 So.2d 507 17 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 582