State v. Durley’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2013
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kansas City v. Travelers Insurance Company · Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. North Kansas City
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[F]or determining the penalty for attempts and conspiracies, offenses defined outside of this code shall be classified as follows:”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Danforth · State v. Belk“1. The provisions of this code shall govern the construction and punishment for any offense defined in this code and committed after January 1, 1979 ... 2. Offenses defined outside of this code and not repealed shall remain in effect ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Danforth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.