Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo’s Empirical Analysis
2024
Citation profile
2 district · 10 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 25b · 15 U.S.C. § 8302 · 16 U.S.C. § 1532 (§ 3 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1801 (American Fisheries Promotion Act) · 16 U.S.C. § 1855 · 28 U.S.C. § 453 · 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 33 U.S.C. § 1312
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Skidmore v. Swift & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 115 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]ourts must exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.