Moody v. NetChoice, LLC Revisions: 7/11/24’s Empirical Analysis
2024
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 47 U.S.C. § 230 (Communications Decency Act § 230)
Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Buckley v. Valeo · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Broadrick v. Oklahoma · United States v. Salerno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We therefore do not deal here with feeds whose algorithms respond solely to how users act online—giving them the content they appear to want, without any regard to independent content standards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[F]acial challenges are disfavored, and neither parties nor courts can disregard the requisite inquiry into how a law works in all of its applications.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Capen v. Campbell“NetChoice chose to litigate these cases as facial challenges, and that decision comes at a cost.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Capen v. Campbell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.