Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 604 A.2d 20 - State v. Tibbetts

State v. Tibbetts’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2025

9 state decisions

301992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Barry · State v. Reeves · State v. Hebert · State v. Longley · State v. Flaherty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The decision whether to impose a sanction on the State for failure to comply with Rule 16(b) is a matter for the trial court and will not be overturned absent a clear showing of an abuse of discretion. “To establish an abuse of discretion, [the defendant] must show that he was, in fact, prejudiced by [a] Rule 16(b) violation and that the prejudice rose to the level of depriving him of a fair trial,” ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.