Farkar Co Hanson Disc Ltd’s Empirical Analysis
604 F.2d 1 · 1979
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2001
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on General Electric Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers · Sobel v. Hertz, Warner & Co. · Wilson Trading Corp. v. David Ferguson, Ltd. · I/S Stavborg v. National Metal Converters, Inc. · International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. General Electric Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the district court should direct the arbitrators to be bound by the limitation of damages provision unless in a separate determination expressed in the award they find the provision to be unconscionable....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.