Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 604 F.2d 103 - Lavash v. Kountze

Lavash v. Kountze’s Empirical Analysis

604 F.2d 103 · 1979

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2012

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

11019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Perry v. Sindermann · Dandridge v. Williams · Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “What appellant wants is the right to have his test results reviewed and to have input into that review to foreclose the possibility that his score might have been adversely affected by the form of the questions and/or the preparer’s determination of the correct answers. The private interest affected here, failure to be promoted through an erroneous determination, is almost chimerical. Opening up ... examination results to inspection and review by all dissatisfied applicants for promotion would impose fiscal and administrative burdens out of all proportion to the ends sought. Such inspection and review would involve a challenge to the substantive validity of the examination. Court proceedings would require the opinion testimony of experts and submerge the court in the testing and grading process. [Id. at 105, 501A.2d 125.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.