Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 604 F.2d 1356 - In re Dill

In re Dill’s Empirical Analysis

604 F.2d 1356 · 1979

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
May 1995
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 103 · 35 U.S.C. § 112

Relies on Application of James R. Tiffin and Earl Erdman · In re Greenfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The evidence presented to rebut a prima facie case of obviousness must be commensurate in scope with the claims to which it pertains.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.