Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 604 F.2d 215 - Roba v. United States

Roba v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

604 F.2d 215 · 1979

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
June 2010
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2010

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

6019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 2243 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Johnson v. Avery · Peyton v. Rowe · WILWORDING Et Al. v. SWENSON, WARDEN · Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “allegedly unlawful conditions of his imminent custody”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “There shall be no right of appeal from a final order in a proceeding to test the validity of a warrant to remove to another district or place for commitment or trial a person charged with a criminal offense against the United States, or to test the validity of such person's detention pending removal proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the final order shall be subject to review”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.