Loefer v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
604 F.3d 1028 · 2010
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Staples · United States v. Hernandez · Link v. Luebbers · United States v. Clara Sophie Loefer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e review the district court's legal conclusions de novo and its factual findings for clear error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Strickland, 466 U.S. at 693 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.