Fruitt v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
604 F.3d 1217 · 2010
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412
Relies on Smith v. Ford Motor Co. · Chamber of Commerce of United States v. Edmondson · Coffey v. Freeport McMoran Copper & Gold · Conrad v. Phone Directories Co. · United States ex rel. Ritchie v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Fees of the clerk and marshal; (2) Fees for printed or electronically recorded transcripts necessarily obtained for use in the case; (3) Fees and disbursements for printing and witnesses; (4) Fees for exemplification and the cost of making copies of any materials where the copies are necessarily obtained for use in the case; (5) Docket fees under section 1923 of this title; (6)Compensation of court appointed experts, compensation of interpreters, and salaries, fees, expenses, and costs of special interpretation services under section 1828 of this title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fruitt v. Astrue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.