Lewis v. Tripp’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

29 federal appellate · 25 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “a court of appeals may have to undertake a cumbersome review of the record to determine [those] facts”). Second, where the”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Lynch v. Barrett · Roosevelt-Hennix v. Prickett

2. “we need not stake out a position in this debate today,” because we conclude that Reed neither personally violated Montaño’s First Amendment rights, nor directed others to do so, nor was deliberately indifferent to the fact that a constitutional violation was occurring. 11 . This remark occurred during a January 2003 meeting between Hook, Marquez, and Reed, and surfaced during discussions about Reed’s knowledge of auditing improprieties occurring within the Lab. See J.A. at 597-98. 12 . Montano contends that”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 394 F. App'x 522 - Hook v. Regents of the University of California

3. “[T]he Supreme Court [has] indicated that, at the summary judgment stage at least, it is generally the district court's exclusive job to determine which facts a jury could reasonably find from the evidence presented to it by the litigants.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Ralston v. Cannon