Estrada v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
604 F.3d 402 · 2010
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1160 (§ 210 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Union Pacific R. Co. v. Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen Gen. Comm. of Adjustment, Central Region · MARIN · Sharkey v. Quarantillo · Khan v. Filip · Johnson v. Orr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“order of removal by the IJ and affirmed by the BIA -- which rested on the conclusion that [plaintiff] is no longer a lawful permanent resident - would necessarily be flawed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“no court shall have jurisdiction to hear any cause or claim by ... any alien arising from the decision or action by the Attorney General to ... execute removal orders ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.