United States v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis
604 F.3d 481 · 2010
Citation profile
17 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Passananti v. Cook County (2012), United States v. Tanner (2010)
17 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Kimbrough v. United States · District of Columbia v. Heller · United States v. Berkowitz · United States v. Wynn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is contrary to the laws of nature or so internally inconsistent or implausible on its face that no reasonable factfinder would credit it[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“tools-of-the-trade'’ rationale to allow jurors limited access to relevant information about drug dealers' gun ownership or possession, not to give prosecutors carte blanche to regale juries with every last prejudicial and unnecessary detail of how it was learned that a particular drug dealer possessed a gun. 5 . To the extent that Tanner argues that the firearms lacked sufficient foundation, we again note that no rule of evidence requires a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A forfeited Rule 403 argument rarely results in reversal because the defendant must show that the evidence was so obviously and egregiously prejudicial that the trial court should have excluded it even without any request from the defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.