Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 604 F.3d 939 - Cooey v. Strickland

Cooey v. Strickland’s Empirical Analysis

604 F.3d 939 · 2010

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on McCleskey v. Zant · Herrera v. Collins · Ford v. Wainwright · Calderon v. Thompson · Baze v. Rees

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether [Garner] has demonstrated a strong likelihood of success on the merits; (2) whether he will suffer irreparable injury in the absence of equitable relief; (3) whether the stay will cause substantial harm to others; and (4) whether the public interest is best served by granting the stay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.