604 F. Supp. 1021 - Dinces v. Robbins’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger · Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc. · Schaefer v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood · Great Lakes Rubber Corp. v. Herbert Cooper Co. · United States v. Heyward-Robinson Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether this court has subject matter jurisdiction over the counterclaim depends upon the nature of the counterclaim. If, on the one hand, the counterclaim is a compulsory one, the court may have federal question or diversity subject matter jurisdiction. Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc., 417 U.S. 467 , 469 n. 1, 94 S.Ct. 2504 , 2506 n. 1, 41 L.Ed.2d 243 (1974). If, on the other hand, the counterclaim is’ merely a permissive one, the counterclaim must, generally, be supported by an independent basis of subject matter jurisdiction. Aldens, Inc. v. Packel, 524 F.2d 38 , 52 n. 21 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1684 , 48 L.Ed.2d 187 (1976).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.