Naum v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank · Mansfield Ry Co v. Swan · Morgan v. Commissioner · United States of America Ex Rel. Arthur Rudick v. Melvin Laird, Secretary of Defense, and Stanley Resor, Secretary of the Army · Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]ithout personal jurisdiction over the defendants, any judgment or ruling is without force or effect....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Friedman v. Estate Of · Friedman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.