Lynch v. Rank’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1382E (§ 1616 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 201 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 415 (§ 215 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Rideout v. United States · Califano v. Yamasaki · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · Schweiker v. Gray Panthers · United States v. Mendoza
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the Court would indeed be reluctant to face such an Augean task, it is not required by this case. * * * if a class member in a state outside California objects to his or her state’s implementation of new and correct federal regulations, that matter is for adjudication in the courts of that person’s state, not here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.