Cusamano v. Sobek’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 1746 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 28 U.S.C. § 2072 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Conley v. Gibson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“aspect” of defendant's motion to exclude expert testimony as”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“A violation of a state law or regulation, in and of itself, does not give rise to liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a concession by plaintiff that the court should exclude [the expert's] testimony”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.