State v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Fragoso v. Fell (2005), Kahn v. Griffin (2005)
34 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984)
Relies on Stack v. Boyle · Ex Parte George Milburn · Matter of Blilie · In re Shetsky · State v. Pett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court shall impose the least restrictive of the following conditions that will reasonably assure that the accused will be present for later hearings, will not significantly interfere with the administration of justice and not pose a substantial danger to others or the community or, if no single condition gives that assurance, any combination of the following conditions: (1) Place the accused in the custody of a designated person or organization agreeing to supervise the accused; (2) Place restrictions on the travel, association, or place of abode of the accused during the period of release; (3) Require the execution of an unsecured bond in a specified amount; (4) Require the execution of a bond in a specified amount and the deposit in the registry of the court in cash or other security as directed, of a sum not to exceed 10 percent of the amount of the bond, such deposit to be returned upon the performance of the conditions of release or forfeited for violation of any condition of release; (5) Require the execution of a bond with sufficient solvent sureties, or the deposit of cash in lieu thereof; (6) Require the accused to return to custody during specified hours; or (7) Impose any condition other than detention deemed reasonably necessary to assure appearance as required, assure noninterference with the trial and reduce danger to others or the community.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[we] reach the merits of his [moot] case because cash only bail orders are capable of repetition, likely to evade judicial review, and an issue of statewide significance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“shall be bailable by sufficient sureties.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.