Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 604 NW2D 737 - People v. Whitehead

People v. Whitehead’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Olano · Arizona v. Fulminante · Neder v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]lmost four days later, after being repeatedly questioned by various police officers, defendant signed a statement admitting that he was one of the men who entered the store and committed the assaults.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “provides a warning that statements made by an accused person during a longer detainment may well be found inadmissible for purposes of securing a conviction at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Id. [105] at 58 [ 604 N.W.2d 737 ]. A prompt judicial determination of probable cause for an arrest is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.