Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 604 NW2D 783 - People v. Taylor

People v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2000
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on People v. Webb · 212 Mich. App. 121 - People v. Armstrong · 232 Mich. App. 541 - People v. Fox · Vick v. Heatilator, Inc. · 186 Mich. App. 171 - People v. Tracy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To put in a prison; to put in a place of confinement. To confine a person, or restrain his liberty, in any way.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “implies that it is authorized, sanctioned, or at any rate not forbidden, by law. To say that it is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “awaiting examination, trial, arraignment, [or] sentence,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.