Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 604 So. 2d 1036 - State v. Ross

604 So. 2d 1036 - State v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 1998
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Wainwright v. Witt · Ross v. Oklahoma · Kliewer v. New Jersey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Q.... Mr. Davis, you mentioned that as far as you're concerned there's only one penalty. The law says that you must consider both penalties. Can you in fact consider both penalties? A. I can consider both. But personally that's my vote. (Tr. 156-57).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A. Well, like I said, if you're guilty of murder, my personal opinion is it's, you know, it's the death penalty. (Tr. 181).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the defendant must establish that he was prejudiced by the court's ruling.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.