Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 604 So. 2d 1288 - Britton v. State

604 So. 2d 1288 - Britton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2012

18 state decisions

150199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Florida Bar re Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar · Hand v. State · 548 So. 2d 1103 - Bull v. State · 397 So. 2d 931 - Sneed v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “entering or remaining in a dwelling, a structure, or a conveyance with the intent to commit an offense therein . . . Because the language of both the New Jersey and the Florida burglary statutes is similar to WlS. Stat. § 943.10, we are persuaded by the interpretations of those states' courts. 3 ¶ 16. It is also important to note that Steele intended to possess a firearm while he was in the dwelling. Harbour told the police that, when Steele took possession of the shotgun outside the residence, he told Harbour that he was "going to make this asshole leave her alone.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Generally, impeachment concerning a defendant's prior convictions is limited to two questions. The first question establishes that the defendant has committed a felony or other offense involving dishonesty or false statement. If the defendant admits such a conviction, then the prosecutor can establish the number of such prior convictions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “there is no requirement that [the] crime must be one that can be completed solely within fixed limits of [a] particular place, only that [the] crime is intended to be committed there.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.