604 So. 2d 436 - Dailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

cited by 9 later decisions

states following

January 1997

most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 555 So. 2d 818 - Johnson v. State · 423 So. 2d 348 - Sanders v. State · 384 So. 2d 871 - Magro v. State · Wright v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“Any inconsistencies and conflicts in the evidence were for the jury to resolve. This court is not a finder of fact and will not second-guess juries in their conclusions as to the facts of a case. ' "[V]erdicts rendered [on conflicting evidence] are conclusive on appeal.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 673 So. 2d 786 - Winters v. State · 662 So. 2d 1227 - Rowe v. State
“Player v. State , 568 So.2d 370 , 373 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990). Moreover,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 715 So. 2d 825 - Boyd v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.