Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 604 So. 2d 559 - Eady v. State

604 So. 2d 559 - Eady v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
December 2001
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 527 So. 2d 1380 - Florida Bar v. Mullins · Fernandez v. Fernandez · Carter v. State · 566 So. 2d 914 - Tarpley v. State · 571 So. 2d 533 - Rackley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Turning to the scoresheet challenge, appellant correctly asserted that assessment of 150 points under the category of first degree felony punishable by life was improper. “A capital felony and a life felony must be so designated by statute.” Sec. 775.081(1), Fla. Stat. (1989). Second-degree murder, appellant’s convicted offense, is designated by statute as “a felony of the first degree, punishable by imprisonment for a term of years not exceeding life ...” Sec. 782.04(2), Fla. Stat. (1989). In view of the statutory designation, the second-degree murder conviction should have been scored as a first-degree felony, without the punishable by life designation. Nevertheless, the scoresheet error in this case was harmless, because deletion of the excess points places appellant in the same guidelines recommended sentencing range.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “oral statements to the contrary as reflected in the transcript of a sentencing hearing, or by written statements to the contrary contained in a negotiated plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a felony of the first degree, punishable by imprisonment for a term of years not exceeding life ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.