604 So. 2d 561 - Archer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2016
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gissendanner v. State · 566 So. 2d 69 - Young v. State · 571 So. 2d 1380 - Haynes v. State · Yancey v. State · 415 So. 2d 75 - Viars v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where a defendant’s claim is that his plea was entered without a full understanding of its consequences, his remedy is through either a motion to vacate his plea ...ora motion to vacate his judgment and sentence under Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 .... Because Archer has submitted neither motion to the trial court, he is entitled to no relief due to any misunderstanding as to the consequences of his plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Staples v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.