Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 604 So. 2d 783 - Robertson v. State

604 So. 2d 783 - Robertson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 814 So. 2d 390 - State v. Johnson (2002), 775 So. 2d 950 - State v. Miles (2000)

57 state decisions

280199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · 451 So. 2d 844 - State v. Hogan · Harris v. State · 382 So. 2d 697 - State v. Bender

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" Bender noted that, prior to the adoption of the implied consent law, scientific test results for intoxication were admissible `if a proper predicate established that (1) the test was reliable, (2) the test was performed by a qualified operator with the proper equipment and (3) expert testimony was presented concerning the meaning of the test.'"”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a moot concern if the state proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant operated a motor vehicle with an unlawful blood-alcohol level.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “A chemical analysis of the person’s blood to determine the alcoholic content thereof must have been performed substantially in accordance with methods approved by the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services and by an individual possessing a valid permit issued by the department for this purpose. The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services may approve satisfactory techniques or methods, ascertain the qualifications and competence of individuals to conduct such analyses, and issue permits which will be subject to termination or revocation at the discretion of the department.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.