Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

604 So. 2d 844

Katz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-06-24

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1993

5 state decisions

Relies on 592 So. 2d 767 - Tillman v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-06-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellant pled no contest to charges of possession of cocaine, possession of dia-zepam, and possession of cannabis. On this appeal he raises three issues concern*845ing his plea and the conditions and provisions of the order of probation entered by the trial court. We find merit in only one point.

¶2For the reason stated in Tillman v. State, 592 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), we strike the special condition of probation numbered 6 which prohibits the appellant from using intoxicants to excess and visiting places where intoxicants, drugs or other dangerous substances are unlawfully sold, dispensed or used.

¶3Affirmed as modified.

DANAHY, A.C.J., ALTENBERND, J., and BENTLEY, E. RANDOLPH, Associate Judge, concur.
/604/so2d/844 · .json · Public domain